Making Noninterpretivism Respectable: Michael J. Perry's Contributions to Constitutional Theory
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Constitutional Theory, Constitutional Culture
Constitutional theorists and other constitutional commentators make heavy use of a paradigm that mistakes certain aspects of our current constitutional decisionmaking process for inherent parts of our constitutional structure and ignores other important aspects of that process entirely. These distortions and elisions raise concerns about the accuracy of much descriptive constitutional commentar...
متن کاملMaking inconsistency respectable in software development
The development of software systems inevitably involves the detection and handling of inconsistencies. These inconsistencies can arise in system requirements, design specifications and, quite often, in the descriptions that form the final implemented software product. A large proportion of software engineering research has been devoted to consistency maintenance, or geared towards eradicating i...
متن کاملContributions of Sasang Constitutional Medicine
Sasang Constitutional Medicine (SCM), also referred to as ‘integrative medicine’, constitutes a unique contribution to the growing field of complementary and alternative medicine. Like all other ancient cultures—including those from India, (Ayurveda) China (TCM), Japan (Kampo), Korea (TKM) and the Mediterranean (TAIM)—there is an emerging fascination with, and indeed use of, these approaches as...
متن کاملMichael J. Ryan
Michael J. Ryan is the Clark Hubbs Regents Professor in Zoology in the Section of Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin, USA, and a Research Fellow at the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute in Panama. His main research has been on sexual selection and communication and his 1985 book The Túngara Frog: A Study of Sexual Selection and Communication has become a classic in that fiel...
متن کاملMaking inconsistency respectable: a logical framework for inconsistency in reasoning
We claim there is a fundamental diierence between the way humans handle inconsistency and the way it is currently handled in formal logical systems: To a human, resolving inconsistencies is not necessarily done by \restoring" consistency but by supplying rules telling one how to act when the inconsistency arises. For artiicial intelligence there is an urgent need to revise the view that inconsi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Michigan Law Review
سال: 1983
ISSN: 0026-2234
DOI: 10.2307/1288399